Trypanosoma cruzi (DTU TcI) in a fatal case of meningoencephalitis due to Chagas disease reactivation in a patient coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus: case report

This investigation details a fatal case of meningoencephalitis resulting from Chagas disease reactivation involving the discrete typing unit TcI of Trypanosoma cruzi in an HIV-coinfected individual from Paraná, Brazil
The reactivation of Chagas disease (RCD) by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with high mortality and is a relevant public health problem in areas endemic for the causative agent of CD, Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi)

Lucas da Silva HF – Reactivation of Chagas disease in a patient with HIV.

Hevillyn Fernanda Lucas da Silva[1], Luís Fernando Fernandes Miranda[2], Matheus da Silva de Oliveira[2], Pedro Paulo Gilio Saraiva[2], Rafael Zanutto Nakata[2], Rodrigo Pernomian Cianca[2], Rúbia Pazzetto[3], Cesar Helbel[4], Amanda Regina Nichi de Sá[2], Cristiane Maria Colli[2],[5] and  Max Jean de Ornelas Toledo[1],[2]

[1]. Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Maringá, PR, Brasil.

[2]. Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Ciências Básicas da Saúde, Maringá, PR, Brasil.

[3]. Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Hospital Universitário Regional de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brasil.

[4]. Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Medicina, Maringá, PR, Brasil.

[5]. Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Dourados, MS, Brasil.

Corresponding author: Dr. Max Jean de Ornelas Toledo. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The reactivation of Chagas disease (RCD) by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with high mortality and is a relevant public health problem in areas endemic for the causative agent of CD, Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi). Here, we report a fatal case of meningoencephalitis caused by RCD involving the discrete typing unit (DTU) of T. cruzi I (TcI) in an HIV-coinfected patient from Paraná, Brazil. Based on computed tomography findings, a 55-year-old man initially underwent empirical treatment for neurotoxoplasmosis. However, Giemsa-stained cerebrospinal fluid and blood smears revealed T. cruzi trypomastigotes on direct microscopic examination. Protozoa were detected by fresh blood examination and blood culture. Additionally, anti-T. cruzi immunoglobulin G antibodies were detected in serum using a chemiluminescent immunoassay. Blood culture sequencing of cytochrome oxidase II confirmed the DTU TcI infection. Benznidazole therapy was administered for 76 d; however, the patient showed no clinical improvement and died nearly 7 months after hospital admission. The fatal outcome was likely related to delayed diagnosis and treatment, severe immunosuppression (CD4 = 39 cells/mm³), high viral load (94,638 copies/mL), and the involvement of TcI, which has been consistently associated with fatal RCD-related meningoencephalitis.

Keywords: DTU TcI. Chagas disease. Human immunodeficiency virus. Central nervous system. Meningoencephalitis.

Data Availability Statement: Research data is only available upon request.

Financial Support: The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development for the productivity grant from MJOT (process numbers: 314927/2020-4 and 315180/2023-4) and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel in Brazil for a doctoral grant from HFLS-Financing Code 001.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Editor: Dalmo Correia Filho

Orcid

Hevillyn Fernanda Lucas da Silva: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-8194

Luis Fernando Fernandes Miranda: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9470-7084

Matheus da Silva de Oliveira: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7304-4580

Pedro Paulo Gilio Saraiva: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2951-1620

Rafael Zanutto Nakata: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6433-9739

Rodrigo Pernomian Cianca: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0488-0921

Rúbia Pazzeto: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0694-4796

Cesar Helbel: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3893-475X

Cristiane Maria Colli: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-7519

Amanda Regina Nichi de Sá: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-9786

Max Jean de Ornelas Toledo: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6314-8668

Introduction

Reactivation of Chagas disease (RCD) has been established as an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining condition1,2, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-Trypanosoma cruzi coinfection is associated with high mortality1,2.

RCD can manifest as myocarditis or meningoencephalitis2,3. RCD involving the central nervous system (CNS) can be fatal. Therefore, early detection and treatment are necessary to maximize survival3. Etiological confirmation of RCD, particularly with CNS involvement, should follow a hierarchical approach based on diagnostic specificity. The gold standard is the detection of T. cruzi amastigotes in brain tissue obtained through biopsy, surgical procedures, or autopsy. Direct microscopic observation of motile trypomastigotes in fresh cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) preparations provides rapid evidence of high parasitemia in the CNS. In cases where microscopy is negative, but clinical and radiological suspicion remains high, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for T. cruzi in the CSF can quantify parasitemia and identify a patient coinfected with HIV/T. cruzi infection with reactivation. An increase in HIV viral load, a decrease in the number of CD4+ cells/mm3, and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio are cofactors for increased parasitemia that can be used to target the introduction of early, pre-emptive therapy4. Neuroimaging, such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, may reveal mass-effect lesions suggestive of Chagasic meningoencephalitis, although these findings are not pathognomonic. In addition, when cardiac reactivation is suspected, electrocardiography and echocardiography may detect signs of acute myocarditis, contributing to clinical assessment even though they do not confirm the etiology on their own2, and ruling out other diagnostic hypotheses3.

Although serological testing for T. cruzi is essential to establish prior exposure and to confirm chronic Chagas disease (CD), it does not distinguish between latent infections and reactivation. Furthermore, in immunosuppressed individuals, such as patients with HIV/AIDS, antibody production may be impaired, potentially leading to false-negative results. In contrast, molecular methods, such as qPCR, are essential for confirming reactivation, as they enable direct detection and quantification of circulating T. cruzi DNA in the blood or CSF. This technique is highly sensitive, particularly during reactivation when parasitemia is elevated, and can provide positive results even when microscopy is negative. Thus, qPCR is a valuable tool for prospective monitoring of T. cruzi parasitemia in patients coinfected with HIV and etiological confirmation of RCD, and may also contribute to monitoring treatment response2,4,5.

Currently, seven T. cruzi discrete typing units (DTUs) have been recognized: TcI–TcVI and Tcbat6,7. This genetic diversity can significantly influence the clinical presentation, prognosis, and treatment response during RCD6,7. Evidence suggests that certain DTUs such as TcI and TcII are associated with distinct clinical manifestations and tissue tropism patterns that may affect the severity of reactivation, particularly in immunosuppressed patients. Moreover, genetic variations among parasitic strains may affect susceptibility to benznidazole (BZ) and other trypanocidal drugs, thereby influencing therapeutic efficacy8. Thus, identifying the DTU (s) involved may provide prognostic information and support individualized clinical decision-making. However, information on the DTUs involved in RCD in patients with HIV/AIDS, including the frequency of this association, survival/death rates, recommendations for an optimal treatment regimen, and clinical outcomes based on DTU, is scarce.

We report a fatal case of RCD meningoencephalitis in a patient coinfected with HIV and T. cruzi (DTU TcI) and review the literature on this topic. Using the terms “HIV or reactivation,” “Chagas disease or T. cruzi,” and “DTU or lineages or genotype” in the Cochrane Library, LILACS, SciELO, MEDLINE/PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Portal Capes databases, including secondary references, we identified eleven relevant publications (Table 1) on T. cruzi-HIV coinfection9-19, except publications of Cura et al. (2012)14 and (2015)17 in which 34 patients presented with clinical reactivation in the context of immunosuppression (33 transplant recipients and one with lymphoma). We aimed to identify the DTUs present in cases of reactivation involving the CNS, and to characterize the general aspects observed in these cases. All 11 publications were considered in the analyses, including 5 published before the division of T. cruzi into DTUs9-13. In earlier studies, DTUs were inferred based on previously used classifications20.

Case report

In November 2020, a 55-year-old retired man with a history of alcohol and tobacco use and no known family ties was admitted to the emergency room at Hospital Universitário Regional de Maringá in a disoriented state with left hemiparesis and dysarthria. He reported a childhood brain injury previously treated with an unspecified medication, which was discontinued owing to alcohol use and not resumed, despite 1 year of abstinence. On admission, the patient presented with malaise, tongue rigidity, and vomiting. He had not sought medical care for approximately 5 years. He was born in the municipality of Terra Boa, and lived in the municipality of Paiçandu, Northwest of Paraná, Brazil. Computed tomography (CT) of the head revealed hypoattenuation of the right frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes (Figure 1A and B). The patient was started on acetylsalicylic acid and simvastatin owing to the suspicion of stroke and was subsequently moved to a ward.

Upon admission, a rapid HIV test yielded a positive result; however, this condition was unknown to the patient and his family.

As the patient showed no clinical improvement by 17 d after admission (d.a.a.), CT was repeated on December 5, 2020, which revealed typical signs of neurotoxoplasmosis; thus, empiric treatment for this infection was started with 75 mg/day pyrimethamine, 1,500 mg sulfadiazine, and 4 mg dexamethasone every 6 h, and 15 mg/day folinic acid. Two additional CT scans were performed during hospitalization, during which the same radiological findings were observed.

Meningoencephalitis caused by RCD was diagnosed at 22 d.a.a. (December 10, 2020) following direct blood and CSF examination of material collected at 20 d.a.a., which had a slightly cloudy appearance, together with CT signs of meningoencephalitis that were thought to be neurotoxoplasmosis-related. CSF analysis revealed pleocytosis with a predominance of mononuclear leukocytes, glucose and protein levels within the reference values (Table 2), and the presence of flagellated protozoa. The CSF and whole blood samples were sent to the Chagas Disease and Molecular Parasitology Laboratory at the State University of Maringá (UEM) for parasitological analyses. After Giemsa staining of the CSF and blood smears, direct examination by optical microscopy led to the identification of trypomastigote forms of T. cruzi (Figure 1C and D). The patient was subsequently started on etiological treatment with benznidazole (100 mg every 8 h). A fresh blood examination and blood culture (in liver infusion tryptose medium) were positive for T. cruzi. Furthermore, anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies were detected in the serum using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay carried out at the Teaching, Research, and Clinical Analysis Laboratory of UEM.

In order to rule out other diagnostic hypotheses, tests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, and cytomegalovirus yielded negative results. However, low concentrations of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies were found in the CSF (0.20 and 0.03 IU/mL of immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM, respectively), and thus, empiric treatment for toxoplasmosis was maintained.

An HIV viral quantification test and CD4 + T lymphocyte count performed on January 12, 2021 (55 d.a.a.) revealed a high viral load and low lymphocyte count (Table 2). Antiretroviral treatment (ART) with 300 mg tenofovir, 50 mg dolutegravir, and 300 mg lamivudine was started on this date, in expectation of the patient’s clinical improvement, since he was very weak upon admission. Weekly assessments, including ECG monitoring, were conducted to identify possible adverse reactions to medications, such as changes in liver and kidney function and/or cardiotoxicity.

Despite initiating RCD and HIV treatments, the clinical picture worsened, and the patient displayed a decerebrate posture, diffuse hypertonia, and deviation of gaze to the right, in addition to acquiring nosocomial infections that were treated with antibiotics. No typical CD changes were observed on transthoracic echocardiography or esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The patient completed 76 d of RCD treatment, was discharged to the care of his family on April 5, 2021 (138 d.a.a.) without clinical improvement and died 1 month later. According to the official death certificate (issued on May 7, 2021), no autopsies were performed. The documented causes of death were as follows: R98, unattended death; B58.2, toxoplasmic meningoencephalitis (listed as the underlying cause); B57.2, chronic Chagas disease with cardiac involvement; and I69.4, sequelae of an unspecified cerebrovascular accident.

Although T. cruzi was detected by direct microscopic examination of both the blood and CSF, indicating a high parasitic load, initial attempts to genotype the parasite using two different molecular methods were unsuccessful. PCR analyses using 24Sα ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and cytochrome oxidase II (COII) markers were performed directly on these biological samples, but did not result in amplification, indicating an insufficient amount of parasite DNA. Detection and molecular characterization were only possible using DNA extracted from positive blood cultures, highlighting the limitations of direct genotyping methods that rely on the amount of DNA present in the sample. We clarified that conventional PCR was employed in this study because qPCR methodology was not available in our laboratory at the time, making its use for patient sample analysis unfeasible.

PCR was performed to amplify the 24Sα rDNA sequence of T. cruzi isolated from the blood culture for genotyping21. After separation on a 6% polyacrylamide gel, bands equivalent to those of the reference strains, corresponding to TcI, TcIII, and TcV, were observed in the patient’s blood culture, presenting two amplified products of approximately 110 and 125 bp. To determine the DTU involved, PCR of the COII gene was performed21 and the amplicons were sequenced in both directions according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in an automated DNA sequencer (3500xL, Applied Biosystems22. Nucleotide sequences were analyzed and edited using bioinformatics tools such as reverse complementation (https://www.bioinformatics.org/sms/rev_comp.html) and Pairwise Sequence Alignment (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/jdispatcher/psa/emboss_needle). BLAST software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) compared the nucleotide sequences analyzed in the present study with sequences available in GenBank. This search revealed that the patient’s isolate belonged to DTU TcI with a DNA sequence similar to that of the strain published in GenBank, access EU302215.122. Electropherogram detected a single DTU in the patient’s blood culture. However, the possibility of selecting a specific DTU for cultivation cannot be ruled out. Selective pressure from the in vitro environment may favor the clonal expansion of specific variants, thus reducing the genetic heterogeneity of the original isolate. However, this may require a considerable manipulation time6. The DNA sequence of COII of T. cruzi isolated from the patient, the BLAST results, and the COII sequences of standard strains from TcI to TcVI were used for alignment and construction of the phylogenetic tree using the software MEGA version 1223, as shown in Figure 1E.

Literature review

A total of 76 cases of CD in immunosuppressed patients, with or without clinical reactivation, have been reported, along with the identification of the corresponding T. cruzi DTUs9-19, of which 23 were unspecified (transplanted or coinfected with T. cruzi/HIV)14, 11 were transplanted, and 1 patient had lymphoma17. The remaining 41 patients were coinfected with T. cruzi/HIV (Table 1). Notably, eight coinfected patients were receiving antiretroviral therapy and did not present with reactivation18. Considering all patients who had their DTU determined and excluding genotyping results with ambiguous identification, such as those suggesting a TcII – TcVI, TcII/V/VI, or TcV/VI pattern, TcI, TcII, TcV, and TcVI were identified in pure and mixed infections of two DTUs in 53 patients. TcV was the most prevalent, found in 28 (52.8%) patients11,13,14,17,19, followed by TcI in 18 (34%) patients12-15,17, TcVI9,11,14,19 and TcII11,14-18 in 9 (17%) patients (Table 1). Pure infection by only one DTU was detected, in descending order, in 25% of patients infected with TcV, 21,1% of those infected with TcI, 19% of those infected with TcII, and 4.8% of those infected with TcVI, and mixed infections by two DTUs were detected in 15 (19.7%) patients. These DTUs were mainly detected in 51 (67.1%) patients from Argentina (TcV, TcVI, TcII, and TcI), 11 (14.5%) patients from Brazil (TcII and TcVI), 3 (4.0%) patients from Paraguay, 2 (2.6%) patients from Bolivia (TcI and TcV) and 1 (1.3%) patient from Colombia (TcI and TcII). In eight patients (10.5%), DTU was not determined (Table 1). TcV is the most common DTU in the Southern Cone of South America and is found in approximately 50% of the patients in Argentina7. Additionally, TcI, which is widely distributed and prevalent in the Andes, is the DTU most frequently associated with CNS involvement in patients with HIV, especially in severe reactivations7,11,15.

A survey of 48 HIV-positive patients with or without CNS involvement identified distinct clinical outcomes and the associated T. cruzi DTUs (Table 3). Among them, 26 (54.2%) survived, 11 (22.9%) died, and 11 (22.9%) had unknown outcomes13,17.

Among the 26 survivors, outcomes varied: one was discharged in a comatose state10, one remained alive 30 months postreactivation11, one patient with encephalitis, BZ-treated and seroconverted, six were classified as having the indeterminate form of CD, one was treated with loss of follow-up, and three were recorded only as “alive”13. Additionally, four patients completed BZ (or BZ + nifurtimox) treatment for 60–90 d19. Fifty percent (6/12) of all the BZ-treated patients survived or had negative diagnostic tests 13,18,19. Among those who died, four received BZ but did not complete the full course of treatment, succumbing to neurological or other complications19 (Table 3). Of the patients (20.8%) undergoing antiretroviral therapy (ART), all survived, and eight did not present with RCD, highlighting the effectiveness of ART in preventing reactivation16,18,19.

DTUs were unequivocally identified in 34 cases, of which 23 (67.7%) involved a single DTU and 11 (32, 4%) involved mixed infections. The most prevalent DTU was TcV, found in 21 (61.8%) patients, followed by TcII found in eight (23.5%), TcI in seven (21.9%), the combination TcV+TcVI in four (11.8%), and TcVI alone in two (5.9%) (Table 3). Most patients originated from Argentina and Paraguay, where TcV predominates, suggesting an association between patient origin and the geographic distribution of DTU7.

Among the 34 cases in which DTU or combinations of DTUs were identified, nine (26.5%) had no reported clinical outcomes. Among the patients with available outcome data, 11 (32.4%) died. All four DTUs were detected in fatal cases. However, case lethality rates varied according to DTU in the following decreasing order: TcI (100%; 3/3), TcVI (66.7%; 4/6), TcV (35.3%; 6/17), and TcII (28.6%, 2/7) (Table 3). Mixed infections were reported in all four cases in which DTU TcI was identified (cases 4, 13, 17, and 25). Nevertheless, in the three cases that progressed to death, TcI was the only DTU detected in the CSF/brain, a finding consistent with the present case. Although the higher lethality observed may be related to CNS involvement, the limited number of cases and the frequent occurrence of mixed infections highlight the need for further studies to confirm the potential associations with specific DTUs, particularly TcI.

Among the 26 surviving patients, DTU characterization was not available for 14 (53.9%), whereas it was unequivocally identified in 12 (46.2%). Among these, TcV was the most frequent, detected in nine patients (75%), followed by TcVI in two (16.7%), and TcII in one (8.3%) (Table 3). Additionally, a mixed infection with TcI and TcV was reported in a patient treated with BZ, who was subsequently lost13.

In this review, no clear association was observed between DTU and response to BZ treatment or between DTU and tissue tropism, as all four DTUs were detected across various sample types (blood, brain tissue, CSF, heart tissue, and skin), with TcV being particularly frequent (Table 3). However, TcV alone was detected in 14 blood samples and 6 brain/CSF samples, and TcI alone was detected in 4 brain/CSF samples.

Ethical aspects: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee / National Research Ethics Committee, Opinion Number: 5.989.993.

Discussion

Although RCD is recognized as an AIDS-defining condition1,2 the as far as our knowledge, this is the first report of Chagas meningoencephalitis diagnosed in a live HIV patient presenting with TcI infection in Brazil. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the patient harbors other DTUs, in addition to TcI, since the blood culture can select a particular DTU with a greater capacity for growth in the culture medium to the detriment of others.

In the present case, the detection of DTU TcI was achieved via blood culture of the patient’s blood while still alive, while in the Colombian patient, it was achieved in postmortem heart (TcI + TcII) and brain tissue (TcI) (Tables 1 and 3)15. Additionally, mixed infections of the four DTUs (TcI, TcII, TcV, and TcVI) have been found in different biological materials (blood, heart, brain, and CSF) and in approximately 15 patients from Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Brazil, and Paraguay13-15,17,19. All four DTUs were detected in the CSF/brain.

The direct association between T. cruzi DTU and the clinical manifestations of CD remains poorly understood. This case occurred in a Brazilian state, where TcII was predominant in patients with chronic CD7,24. Additionally, three other cases in Brazil identified pure infection with TcII in the blood of one patient with CNS reactivation16 and two patients without reactivation under antiretroviral therapy, in addition to mixed infection of TcII + TcV/VI in a fourth patient18 (Table 3), highlighting the importance of considering the prevalence of different T. cruzi DTUs in the region in cases of HIV coinfection. Notably, the absence of TcIII and TcIV in cases of RCD, corroborating the findings of Cura et al. (2012)14, which may have significant implications for understanding the epidemiology and pathogenesis of the disease in HIV coinfected patients.

Upon admission, the patient presented with hemiparesis, dysarthria, and gaze deviation, which initially led to a suspicion of stroke. However, the signs and symptoms observed during hospitalization were deemed more consistent with those of meningoencephalitis (decerebration, lowered level of consciousness, and hypertonia)1-3, and thus, an investigation into the cause was conducted.

CD is considered a neglected disease2,3; thus, the lack of resources and infrastructure in endemic areas can impede the diagnosis of affected individuals. The diagnosis of nonclassic cases such as RCD is even more challenging.

The exclusion of differential diagnoses is essential for all immunocompromised patients in whom CNS damage is suspected2,19. Infectious and ischemic processes cannot be differentiated based on hypoattenuating focal lesions and mass effects on CT images because these are nonspecific findings. In the present case, RCD was diagnosed after the detection of anti-T. cruzi antibodies in the serum and protozoa in the blood and CSF, as well as the exclusion of other causes. We could rule out the possibility that the CNS lesions were associated with HIV-related encephalitis; however, we could not rule out the possibility that they were related to neurotoxoplasmosis owing to the similarity in injury patterns between both infections1,2. Furthermore, the present case is similar to that reported by Hernández et al. (2014)15 in a Colombian patient. This is a typical example of RDC in an AIDS patient presenting with neurochagoma and coinfection with different DTUs. In this case from Colombia, TcI showed a specific tropism for the CNS, as observed in other studies12. Late diagnosis and confusion with cerebral toxoplasmosis contributed to the fatal outcome, and the authors advocated the formal inclusion of T. cruzi on the list of opportunistic pathogens for HIV management. Neurotoxoplasmosis is a common confounding factor in cases of RCD meningoencephalitis15, which can delay specific treatment and worsen the prognosis. In this case, treatment for neurotoxoplasmosis was initiated 5 d before the identification of T. cruzi.

In Brazil, serological testing of anti-T. cruzi antibodies be conducted in all cases of CNS damage where the patient is HIV-positive, which is little done1,3. A definitive diagnosis of RCD is only possible, however, with the analysis of CSF. The characteristics include a clear appearance, pleocytosis with slight lymphocytosis, normal or slightly reduced glycorrhachia, and a slight increase in proteins3. Of particular importance, as seen in the present case, is the visualization of T. cruzi trypomastigote forms using direct microscopy of body fluid samples (blood and CSF).

Although direct parasitological tests of the blood and CSF were negative during follow-up, this does not rule out therapeutic failure, as these conventional methods have low sensitivity and may not detect residual drug-resistant T. cruzi subpopulations. In the present case, parasite persistence was confirmed by the isolation and genotyping of viable forms in blood culture, suggesting BZ resistance. qPCR, a more sensitive tool for detecting low-level parasitemia and monitoring treatment response in immunosuppressed patients, might have identified this earlier2,5. However, the absence of this methodology in our laboratory is a limitation of the present study.

The relationship between parasitemia and CD4 + T lymphocyte count has already been investigated in T. cruzi/HIV coinfection25. A direct relationship between the level of parasitemia (quantified by PCR) and viral load and an inverse relationship between parasitemia and the level of CD4+ T lymphocytes, or the CD4+/CD8+ ratio, in coinfected individuals has already been demonstrated1,4,5. It is estimated that 20% of coinfected people will have RCD; however, when considering individuals with a CD4 count of <200 cells/mm³, this percentage increases to around 80%1,4. Consistent with this, in the present case, the CD4 count reached 39 cells/mm³ prior to treatment.

In general, opportunistic infections are treated before initiating ART, thus avoiding the development of Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome, especially if there is a past or current history of coinfections or opportunistic infections1. Treatment of RCD in HIV-positive patients must be initiated immediately; 5 mg/kg/day benznidazole in two doses, not exceeding 300 mg/day, for up to 60 d is recommended1-3. In the present case, treatment with benznidazole began 2 d after the diagnosis of CD (22 d.a.a.), as the detection of trypomastigotes in the CSF is considered the gold standard for chagasic meningoencephalitis2. After starting treatment, the parasitic forms were no longer detected in the CSF (Table 2). Despite this, the RCD treatment lasted 76 d, which was justified by the absence of clinical improvement.

The prognosis of patients with RCD and CNS involvement is unfavorable, with mortality rates after reactivation ranging 79–100%1. However, when treatment is initiated within 30 d, the survival rate can reach approximately 80%¹,³. Recent evidence has highlighted that early diagnosis, immediate antiparasitic treatment, regular patient follow-up, and epidemiological surveillance are essential for the management of T. cruzi/HIV coinfection and RCD. This is particularly critical in cases of meningoencephalitis, which is associated with high mortality, as all untreated patients have been reported to die shortly after diagnosis25. Although the patient was treated with benznidazole shortly after the diagnosis of RCD, he died. It is possible that infection with T. cruzi DTU TcI, reported to have a lower susceptibility to the drug8—may have contributed to the unfavorable clinical outcomes. In this case, the late diagnosis of coinfection, delay in initiating antitrypanosomal treatment, and ART likely affected the outcome.

Mixed infection with TcII + TcV/VI was detected in one T. cruzi/HIV coinfected subject from São Paulo, Brazil, with a significant increase in CD4 T-cells counting and a decrease in viral load, which became undetectable over the years after ART18. Experimental studies have shown that TcII (clonal genotype 32) and TcVI (zymodeme B) are more drug-sensitive, TcV (clonal genotype 39) is partially drug-resistant, and TcI (mainly clonal genotype 20) is drug resistant8. The literature review did not demonstrate a clear association between DTU and the response to antiparasitic treatment, which may be explained by the fact that the efficacy of BZ relies on the host’s immune response. In the present case, this response was compromised, as indicated by a CD4 count below 100 cells/mm³ (Table 2). Therefore, in addition to early diagnosis and treatment, genotyping of T. cruzi DTU(s) present in patients before CD reactivation is highly recommended.

Accurately determining the likely route of infection, history of migration, or history of prior blood transfusion was not possible. However, the two municipalities where the patient lived were in Northwestern Paraná, a region with high climatic and landscape suitability for the CD vector26. Furthermore, this case occurred in a Brazilian state where TcI has rarely been isolated from patients with CD and TcII predominates in immunocompetent patients with chronic CD, although TcI also occurs in the sylvatic transmission cycle in pure and mixed infections with TcII in opossums and triatomines24. Therefore, this may be important in immunosuppressed patients and may be related to a worse prognosis. However, further studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.

This report describes the first documented case of Chagas meningoencephalitis in which the TcI DTU of T. cruzi was diagnosed in a living HIV-positive patient in Brazil, which resulted in death despite treatment with BZ. Although parasitemia was not monitored by qPCR during or after treatment, the diagnosis of RCD was established based on the clinical course and laboratory findings, including the detection of T. cruzi in both CSF and peripheral blood. Given the high clinical suspicion of reactivation, the patient was treated with BZ, following established protocols for such cases. Despite therapeutic intervention, the patient died approximately 1 month after hospital discharge in a clinical context consistent with reactivated Chagasic meningoencephalitis.

This fatal outcome reinforces the lethality of RCD with CNS involvement, particularly associated with TcI DTU, which is more frequent in neurological cases11,13 and is potentially less responsive to BZ7,8. Notably, serological testing for CD should be performed on all patients with neurological signs and symptoms, particularly in individuals with a compatible epidemiological history, such as those of rural origin and those who have lived in endemic areas in the past, such as Northwest of Paraná. The omission of CD from the differential diagnosis of opportunistic CNS infections and acute myocarditis frequently results in delayed initiation of specific anti-T. cruzi therapy. The clinical similarity with other opportunistic infections, such as neurotoxoplasmosis, lack of standardized protocols for parasite genotyping in Brazil, delayed diagnosis, and lack of specific intervention. This case highlights the urgent need for (1) systematic screening of T. cruzi in HIV+ patients with neurological symptoms, (2) implementation of quantitative PCR and genotyping of the CSF for early identification of high-risk DTUs (such as TcI), and (3) evaluation of alternative therapies for reactivation by potentially resistant strains. The underreporting of DTUs in Brazil requires expanded epidemiological surveillance, especially in endemic regions where parasite diversity can influence outcomes.

Authors’ contribution

HFLS: Conception and design of the study, Analysis and interpretation of data, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; LFFM: Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; MSO: Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; PPGS: Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; RZN: Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; RPC: Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; RP: Analysis and interpretation of data, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; CH: Analysis and interpretation of data, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Preparation; ARNS: Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; CMC: Conceptualization, Conception and design of the study, Analysis and interpretation of data, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Preparation; MJOT:  Project Administration, Supervision, Conceptualization, Conception and design of the study, Investigation, Writing – Review Editing Preparation.

Acknowledgments

We offer our deepest thanks to the Regional University Hospital of Maringá for providing information about the case and the Teaching and Research and Clinical Analysis Laboratory, Immunogenetics Laboratory, and the Chagas Disease and Molecular Parasitology Laboratory of the State University of Maringá for laboratory analyses and molecular genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi.

This work was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development for a productivity grant from MJOT (process numbers:314927/2020-4 and 315180/2023-4) and by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel in Brazil for a doctoral grant from HFLS – Financing Code 001.

References

  1. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância, Prevenção e Controle das Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis, do HIV/Aids e das Hepatites Virais. Protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas para manejo da infecção pelo HIV em adultos. Brasília: MS; 2018. 412 p.
  2. Almeida EA, Mendes FSNS, Ramos Júnior AN, Sousa AS, Pavan TBS, Mediano MFF, et al. Diretrizes para Coinfecção Trypanosoma cruzi-HIV e outras Condições Imunossupressoras: Diagnóstico, Tratamento, Monitoramento e Implementação da Rede Internacional de Cuidados e Estudos – 2023. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2023;56:0549.
  3. Dias JCP, Ramos AN Jr, Gontijo ED, Luquetti A, Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Coura JR, et al. II Consenso Brasileiro em Doença de Chagas, 2015. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2016;25(esp):7-86.
  4. Freitas VL, da Silva SC, Sartori AM, Bezerra RC, Westphalen EV, Molina TD, et al. Real-time PCR in HIV/Trypanosoma cruzi coinfection with and without Chagas disease reactivation: association with HIV viral load and CD4 level. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(8):e1277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001277.
  5. Freitas VL, Novaes CTG, Sartori AMC, Carvalho NB, Silva SCVD, Nakanishi ÉS, et al. Quantitative PCR as a marker for preemptive therapy and its role in therapeutic control in Trypanosoma cruzi/HIV coinfection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024;18(2):e0011961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011961. 
  6. Zingales B, Andrade LO, Briones MRS, Campbell DA, Chiari E, Fernandes O, et al. The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infect Genet Evo. 2012;12 (2):240–53.
  7. Zingales B, Bartholomeu D. Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity: impact on transmission cycles and Chagas disease. Men Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2022,117:e210193.
  8. Toledo MJO, Bahia MT, Carneiro CM, Martins-Filho OA, Tibayrenc M, Barnabé C, et al. Chemotherapy with Benznidazole and Itraconazole for Mice Infected with Different Trypanosoma cruzi Clonal Genotypes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(1):223- 22.
  9. Pacheco RS, Ferreira MS, Machado MI, Brito CMM, Pires MQ, Cruz AM, Coutinho SG. Chagas Disease and HIV Co-infection: Genotypic Characterization of the Trypanosoma cruzi Strain. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1998;93(2):165-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02761998000200005
  10. Lages-Silva E, Ramirez LE, Silva-Vergara ML, Chiari E. Chagasic Meningoencephalitis in a Patient with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: Diagnosis, Follow-Up, and Genetic Characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(1):118-23. https://doi.org/10.1086/324355
  11. Burgos JM, Begher SB, Freitas JM, Bisio M, Duffy T, Altcheh J, et al. Molecular diagnosis and typing of Trypanosoma cruzi populations and lineages in cerebral Chagas disease in a patient with AIDS. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73(6):1016-8.
  12. Burgos JM, Begher S, Silva HMV, Bisio M, Duffy T, Levin MJ, et al. Molecular identification of Trypanosoma cruzi I tropism for central nervous system in Chagas reactivation due to AIDS. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;78(2):294-7.
  13. Bisio M, Cura C, Duffy T, Altcheh J, Giganti SO, Begher S, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units in Chagas disease patients with HIV co-infection. Rev Biomed. 2009;20:166-78.
  14. Cura CI, Lucero RH, Bisio M, Oshiro E, Formicheli LB, Burgos LB, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi Discrete Typing Units in Chagas disease patients from endemic and non-endemic regions of Argentina. Parasitol. 2012;139(4):516-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182011002186  
  15. Hernández C, Cucunubá Z, Parra E, Toro G, Zambrano P, Ramírez JD. Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi) and HIV co-infection in Colombia. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;26:146-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.04.002
  16. Buccheri R, Kassab MJ, Freitas VLT, Silva SCV, Bezerra RC, Khoury Z, et al. Chagasic meningoencephalitis in an HIV infected patient with moderate immunosuppression: Prolonged survival and challenges in the HAART era. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo, 2015;57(6):531-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652015000600014
  17. Cura CI, Duffy T, Lucero RH, Bisio M, Péneau J, Jimenez-Coello M, et al. Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay Using TaqMan Probes for the Identification of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs in Biological and Clinical Samples. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(5):e0003765.
  18. Marcon GEB, Ferreira JJG, Almeida EA, Delicio AM, Pereira MB, Wanderley JS, et al. Parasite load evaluation by qPCR and blood culture in Chagas disease and HIV co-infected patients under antiretroviral therapy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(3):e0010317.
  19. Fernandez ML, Albizu CL, Nicita D, Besuschio S, Giomi C, Biondi ML, et al. Molecular Characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi Reactivation and Follow-up in a Case Series of People With HIV. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10(8):ofad357. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad357
  20. Zingales B, Andrade SG, Briones MR, Campbell DA, Chiari E, Fernandes O, et al. A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(7):1051–4. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762009000700021.
  21. Sá ARN, Dias GBM, Kimoto KY, Steindel M, Grisard EC, Toledo MJO, et al. Genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and Trypanosoma rangeli genetic groups in experimentally infected Rhodnius prolixus by PCR-RFLP. Acta Trop. 2016;156:115-21
  22. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74(12):5463-7. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. PMid:271968.
  23. Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Sanderford M, Sharma S, and Tamura K. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol Biol Evol. 2024;41:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae263
  24. Abolis NG, Araújo SM, Toledo MJO, Fernandez MA, Gomes ML. Trypanosoma cruzi I–III in southern Brazil causing individual and mixed infections in humans, sylvatic reservoirs and triatomines. Acta Trop. 2011;120:167–72.
  25. Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Mediano MFF, Novaes CTG, Sousa AS, Sartori AMC, Santana RC, et al. Clinical profile and mortality in patients with T. cruzi/HIV co-infection from the multicenter data base of the “Network for healthcare and study of Trypanosoma cruzi/HIV co-infection and other immunosuppression conditions”. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(9):e0009809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011036.
  26. Ferro e Silva AM, Sobral-Souza T, Muylaert RL, Abreu AP, Pelloso SM, Carvalho MDB, et al. Spatial prediction of risk areas for vector transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in the State of Paraná, southern Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(10):1-17.

FIGURE 1: Computed tomography of the head: (A) in the cross-section, hypoattenuation in the right temporoparietal region and in the left frontal region, both with vasogenic edema; (B) in the coronal section, hypoattenuation in the right temporoparietal region. Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigote form observed in a Giemsa-stained smear of cerebrospinal fluid (C) and blood (D) from the patient (magnification 1000×). Dendrogram depicting the phylogenetic relationships between the patient isolate and the reference strains of the six discrete typing units (DTUs) of Trypanosoma cruzi, based on sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII) gene. The analysis included COII sequences from known molecular patterns of T. cruzi, as Silvio (DTU I – GenBank EU302222.1), Esmeraldo (DTU II – GenBank AF359035.1), 231 (DTU III – GenBank DQ343720.1), CANIII (DTU IV – GenBank AF359030.1), SO3cl5 (DTU V – GenBank AF359039.1), and CL Brener (DTU VI – GenBank OR513512.1). GenBank accession EU302215.1 (DTUI) was included in the analysis because it presented the highest similarity with the sequence obtained from the patient sample, as identified by BLAST software search. The COII sequences of T. cruzi isolated from the patient were submitted to GenBank for analysis and deposit in the genetic archive. The phylogenetic analyses and the neighbour-joining tree were conducted using software MEGA version 1223 (E). Source: the authors.

TABLE 1. Clinical presentation, underlying disease, geographic origin, and Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units (DTUs) identified in patients with Chagas disease and immunosuppression, with or without clinical reactivation.

 

* Zingales et al. (2009)20; # Publications found in the search using seven terms (“HIV or reactivation,” and “Chagas disease or T. cruzi,” and “DTU or lineages or genotype”) and 10 databases (Cochrane Library, LILACS, SciELO, MEDLINE/PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Biblioteca Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações and Portal Capes); ^ Absence of reactivation of Chagas disease.

TABLE 2. Laboratory results at the time of diagnosis of Chagas disease reactivation, during and after treatments.

 

*differential leukocyte counts not performed because of low leukocyte count; a: start of antitrypanosomal treatment; b: start of antiretroviral treatment; -: unperformed; nd: not detected; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase.

TABLE 3: Clinical outcomes, analysed samples, and Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units (DTUs) in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients with or without central nervous system reactivation of Chagas disease (RCD).

 

a Coinfected mothers (5–11) and some of their infants (de 12 a 13); b genetic groups TcI, TcIIb, TcIIc, TcIIa, TcIId and TcIIe correspond to the current DTUs TcI, TcII, TcIII, TcIV, TcV and TcVI, respectively20; c age y: years and sex M: male; F: female; d previously classified as genetic group II (similar to the CL strain)20; e CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; f corresponding to the parasitic lineage 1 (T. cruzi II)20; g BZ = benznidazole; h Absent or unknown reactivation of Chagas disease; i CD: Chagas disease; j ND: not determined; k clinical reactivation in the context of immunosuppression; l under antiretroviral therapy (and one BZ-treated). 

Gostou do conteúdo? Compartilhe com colegas e ajude a fortalecer a ciência.

Últimas notícias

plugins premium WordPress